Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Pammer and Alpenhof cases / Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations / Brussels Regime / Consumer protection / Domicile / Rome I Regulation / Law / Conflict of laws / European Union law


OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Trstenjak delivered on 18 May[removed]Case C[removed]Peter Pammer v
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-03-26 08:06:39


Open Document

File Size: 715,21 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Rome / Trieste / /

Company

Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co KG / Alpenhof GesmbH / Internationale Frachtschiffreisen Pfeiffer GmbH / /

Country

Germany / Austria / Netherlands / Luxembourg / /

Currency

EUR / /

Facility

Court of Justice / Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH / Hotel Alpenhof / /

IndustryTerm

package travel contract / advertising activities / cross-border internet transactions / transportation / customer service telephone number / package travel / package-travel contract / hotel services / conflict-of-law rule / travel lasting several days falls / tourist services / electronic commerce / /

MusicGroup

the Council / the Commission / /

Organization

Court of Justice / Commission on Article / Italian Government / Austrian court / Czech Government / United Kingdom Government / European Union / European Parliament / Austrian Government / Luxembourg Government / Polish Government / /

Person

Peter Pammer / Oliver Heller / /

Position

Advocate / route planner / General / /

Product

C-585 / C-144 / /

ProgrammingLanguage

EC / /

Region

Far East / /

SocialTag