law degree / government applications / cellular phone technology / cellular telephone / individual telephone calls / dialed telephone number / historical communications / implement technology / telephone call information / wireless service / electronic tracking devices / telecommunications carrier / trace devices / mechanical device / case law / telecommunications carriers / Electronic communications / electronic mechanical device / particular telephone / cell-phone monitoring applications / Internet Use / cellular-telephone-derived location information / personal property law / telephone / Courts rejecting government applications / law enforcement / Wireless Calls / remote computing service / mobile telephone user / Internet Age / electronic surveillance law / Wireless Communication / /
MusicGroup
Access / the Government / Device / Process / Cell / /
Organization
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas / See Government / U.S. District court / Federal Bureau of Investigation / Department of Justice / Judiciary Committee / Congress / Electronic Communication Service / Federal Communications Commission / Court of Appeals / UN Court / US Federal Reserve / Congressional Research Service / Digital Due Process Coalition / Cell Site Location Authority / /
Person
Orenstein Opinion / Charles Doyle / John Dickas / Ian James Samuel / Deborah F. Buckman / Gina Stevens / Ann T. McKenna / Louis Freeh / Laurie Thomas Lee / / /
Position
law enforcement officer / magistrate / conclusion Judge / director / judge / Legislative Attorney / /
ProvinceOrState
Texas / Cases Federal / Maryland / Illinois / South Dakota / Pennsylvania / Massachusetts / /
Legal Standard for Disclosure of Cell-Site Information (CSI) and Geolocation