[Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SMITH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioSearch and seizure — Search incident to arr - United States v. Ross - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2014-06-03 09:49:49 Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Citation signal Chimel v. California Arizona v. Gant New York v. Belton California v. Acevedo Searches incident to a lawful arrest Search and seizure United States v. Ross Law Searches and seizures Case law		[Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SMITH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioSearch and seizure — Search incident to arr Add to Reading List Source URL: www.legallyspeakingohio.com Download Document from Source Website File Size: 64,84 KB Share Document on Facebook

	[Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SMITH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St.3d 163, 2009-OhioSearch and seizure — Search incident to arr DocID: 1fX67 - View Document
	WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF SEARCHES OF CELL PHONES INCIDENT TO ARREST? UNITED STATES V. WURIE AND THE RETURN OF CHIMEL Benjamin Wahrer I. II. DocID: 1aIDY - View Document
	Nos & IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ DocID: 18XNx - View Document
	(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 DocID: 18Ijc - View Document
	Nod IN THE Supreme Court of the United States DocID: 18b8k - View Document