Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Mitigating factor / Indiana v. Edwards / Mitigating evidence / Right to counsel / Faretta v. California / Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Gregg v. Georgia / Public defender / Adversarial system / Law / Criminal procedure / Strickland v. Washington


THE ROLES OF CLIENT AND COUNSEL IN LIMITING AND FORGOING MITIGATING EVIDENCE IN A CAPITAL CASE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ...........................................................................................
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-07-17 17:18:09

Open Document

File Size: 291,30 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Washington / /

Company

Lockett / /

Country

United States / /

Event

Person Communication and Meetings / Judicial Event / /

Facility

Court of Appeal / /

IndustryTerm

capital punishment law / case law / /

MarketIndex

Case 105 / /

Organization

UN Court / Supreme Court / Court of Appeal / Court of Appeal of California / /

Person

Note / Gerald P. Koocher / Michelle E. Barnett / Steven N. Sparta / Kenneth B. Dekleva / LINDA E. CARTER ET AL / James Michael Blakemore / Nixon / WAYNE R. LAFAVE ET AL / Daniel R. Williams / Alan M. Goldstein / CARTER ET AL / /

Position

Attorney / psychologist / psychiatrist / Reviewing counsel / COUNSEL / indication counsel / trial attorney / trial judge / devoid counsel / giving counsel / sentencing judge / defense counsel / trial counsel / appellate counsel / judge / lawyer / trained counsel / /

ProvinceOrState

Missouri / Tennessee / Ohio / Indiana / Louisiana / Florida / California / Georgia / Michigan / /

PublishedMedium

the Jury and Appellate Review / /

RadioStation

29 J. AM / 67 When / /

SocialTag