Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Constitutional law / United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. / John Marshall / John Yoo / United States Constitution / Inherent powers / Separation of powers / Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer / Little v. Barreme / Law / Government / Case law


WEEK OF DECEMBER 4, 2006 • VOL. XXIX, NO. 49 President’s Game? History refutes claims of unlimited
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-05-06 14:29:27


Open Document

File Size: 114,40 KB

Share Result on Facebook

Company

The New York Times / ALM Properties Inc. / Yale Law Journal / Columbia Law Review / Tube Co. / Texas Law Review / Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. / /

Continent

South America / /

Country

United States / United Kingdom / /

/

Event

Voting Result / /

Facility

Law Library / Library of Congress / University of California / /

IndustryTerm

steel seizure case / constitutional law / /

MedicalCondition

steel seizure / /

Organization

National Security Agency / Supreme Court / Bush administration / Yale / University of California / Berkeley / Department of Justice / Congress / federal government / U.S. Court of Appeals / UN Court / national government / office of Legal / /

Person

John Yoo / Michael Ramsey / David Levitan / George Sutherland / John Adams / Louis Fisher / C. Perry Patterson / Julius Goebel / Charles Lofgren / Richard Posner / John Marshall / Franklin Roosevelt / John Jay / Robert Jackson / Michael Glennon / /

/

Position

chief justice / Counsel / President / law professor / Commander in Chief / specialist / secretary of state / king / Executive / president / and the courts / representative / president / placing that office outside the control / Marshall / Judge / Chief / /

ProvinceOrState

California / Georgia / /

PublishedMedium

The New York Times / the Columbia Law Review / the Texas Law Review / Yale Law Journal / /

URL

www.legaltimes.com / /

SocialTag