end-use energy efficiency programs / specified energy savings / pollution control device / off-source systems / improved technology / university energy lab / overall energy requirements / transportation / energy service contract compensation / achievable energy savings / predicted energy savings / real energy savings / emission reduction systems / electricity grid / greenhouse gas performance standards / energy projects / electric utilities / Add-on pollution control technologies / energy efficiency measurement / role energy efficiency programs / greenhouse gas / oil / enduse energy efficiency / projected energy savings / energy savings / energy / greenhouse gas emissions / case law / control equipment / electricity / energy consumption / energy service / demonstrated systems / electricity consumption / end-use energy efficiency / energy requirements / energy service contractors / energy efficiency programs / energy efficiency mandates / energy siting / greenhouse gas emission guidelines / energy efficiency / /
MusicGroup
the National / /
Organization
Public Utilities Commission / National Climate Coalition / Supreme Court / Department of Energy / Congress / Federal government / UN Court / Environmental Protection Agency / /
Person
KATE KONSCHNIK / ARI PESKOE / /
Position
Executive / Administrator / /
Product
Section / /
ProvinceOrState
Texas / District of Columbia / Pennsylvania / /
Technology
Add-on pollution control technologies / pollution control / /
Efficiency Rules The Case for End-Use Energy Efficiency Programs in the Section 111(d) Rule for Existing Power Plants KATE KONSCHNIK AND ARI PESKOE March 3, 2014